Rav Dov Fischer
Sermons
On Denying Passover and the Holocaust
The Jewish Journal has revisited the story
pertaining to Jews who question the veracity and authenticity of the
Torah's account of the Jewish exodus from Egypt. We are told that Conservative
Jews are being taught -- at a temple named for Mount Sinai -- to reject
the history our parents taught us, as their parents taught them, that
G-d revealed Himself before our Nation at Mount
Sinai. After twenty years serving in Jewish religious and
community leadership, I believe that such a
Temple
Sinai exists.
When anyone questions whether my nation really were slaves in Biblical
Egypt and whether my people really departed from Egypt en masse, on an
exodus of freedom amid miracles and wonders, with the Red Sea splitting
and a national assemblage at Mount Sinai, there is reason to comment.
The Torah-observant world believes that G-d commanded the Torah laws to
Moshe our Teacher at Mount Sinai,
instructing him for 40 days and nights, a period during which Moshe
neither ate nor drank nor slept. We believe that Moshe descended
Mount Sinai
not only with two tablets bearing Ten Pronouncements but also with The
Teaching -- the Torah law -- of 613 commandments, and that Moshe our
Teacher proceeded to teach these laws orally to the Jewish nation.
Aspects of these 613 laws subsequently were documented for the nation in
the Written Torah, which we call by several names including the
“Chumash,” the “Five Books of Moses,” and the “Pentateuch.”
Torah-observant Jews believe that the Written Torah was authored by the
word of G-d as dictated to Moshe, letter-by-letter. And that is Torah
Judaism 101.
The new division stemming from Temple Sinai, suggesting that the Jews
were not slaves to Pharaoh in Egypt and did not exit en masse as the
Torah says my ancestors did, marks an historic turning point for
Conservative Judaism as the movement nests in the philosophical womb of
Reform Judaism.
A century ago, non-Jewish Bible critics with anti-Jewish axes to grind
propounded that the Torah’s account is apocryphal. They denied there was
a Jewish nation of slaves in
Egypt
chosen by G-d. They denied there were Ten Plagues. They denied that G-d
assembled our Nation at Mount Sinai to
reveal His law to us. Instead, they reinterpreted our Torah as
"inspirational tales" that set the framework for other faiths and
nations. Those critics knew that once the history of our nation and our
forebears was converted from factually authentic to "inspirational," and
that once the laws that define us as a people became equally
"inspirational" rather than Divinely ordained, then our essence was
stripped. And it was for that reason that Solomon Schechter, often
perceived as the father of Conservative Judaism, knowingly described
Bible criticism as the “Higher Anti-Semitism.”
Christians also have inspirational accounts; in fact, they reprint all
of our "inspirational" accounts in their book, too, and they add other
ones. Christianity also advocates ethical behavior, moral behavior.
Mother Theresa was said to be kind. Father Damien cared for the lepers.
So this "inspirational" stuff deserves some thought. If Jews did not
literally receive the Torah from G-d, by the Word of G-d at the hand of
Moshe, then why be Jewish and why not be Christian or something else? If
there was no Divine Revelation at Sinai, why raise hundreds of thousands
of dollars annually to maintain an edifice called
Temple
Sinai and to pay a rabbi
there? Why not be a Christian devoted to ethical humanism, to kindness,
to justice? Why worship supposedly false stories that commemorate things
that never happened, including certain stirring events like the death of
a nation's first-born males? Why mark the Sabbath on Saturday instead of
Sunday? Why face discrimination as a minority when the majority opens
its doors so readily here? Why is a supposedly false tale about Jewish
slaves to Pharaoh more inspiring than the story of the Spartacus
rebellion from Roman slavery or stories of Cinque, the American
revolution, Frederick Douglass, or Harriet Tubman?
More than that. If Jews were not an enslaved nation in Biblical Egypt, who ultimately were led to the Land of Israel by the Word of G-d, then why
promote Zionism? In fact, if the G-d of my ancestors did not give the Land of Israel to my people's ancestors as a
treasured possession, what business do Jews have being there? What
justifies refugees from the persecutions of Christian Eastern Europe
settling amid Moslems in
Palestine? Questions to ponder.
If the story is a fable -- albeit with a nice lesson or two, in the
tradition of the best of fables -- then our existence as a people with a
unique message loses meaning. Because we are then built on a lie.
Jews in America
invest so much trying to perpetuate a civil-religion based on the murder
of six million Jews in the Twentieth Century, fighting the Holocaust
Deniers every step of the way. Yet, the same people would join with
those who deny the very essence of our Being as a nation conceived in
holiness at Mount Sinai. We vigorously
take the Holocaust Deniers to court in France.
We pummel them in court when they sue us for libel. We lobby and insist
that the United States
devote tax dollars and federal space to memorialize a horror that was
perpetrated by Europeans in Europe against Europeans, even though there
is no museum of that kind in
Washington, D.C. to mark the persecution and decimation
of Native Americans. (To learn about the “Trail of Tears,” for example,
one needs to visit locations along a stretch from
Oklahoma, continuing eastward through southwest
Kentucky, and on into Cherokee,
North Carolina.)
So we Jews have no tolerance for those who would deny the Holocaust. But
let someone deny that Jews were slaves to Pharaoh in
Egypt, that there was an exodus from
Egypt
as described in the Torah, that the nation assembled at
Mount Sinai and that G-d Almig-ty revealed Himself there to
the nation -- and that denial is acceptable because it is “scholarship.”
Well, the David Irvings and Arthur Butzes also publish “scholarship.”
Some Holocaust Deniers claim that their research and their excavations
at the concentration camps prove that Zyklon B could not possibly have
been used against Jews because the traces are not found as would be
expected. Others say that their "scholarly findings conclusively prove"
that there was not enough room in all the ovens and gas chambers of the
camps to account for the murder of the millions of Jews said to have
been murdered there. Each of the Deniers’ claims is based on
“scholarship” that parallels the best Biblical archaeological
scholarship. They search for traces of evidence, but they cannot find
any. They measure space to gauge how many people could have fit there
and find the Jewish accounts grossly inflated.
We Jews won’t put up with that kind of “scholarship.” We know better,
and we do not care what anyone says to the contrary. Yet we curiously
abide the “scholarship” built on the “evidence” that is “missing” or
“lacking” in archaeological digs in ancient
Egypt. We can rationalize away our
entire essence. That’s OK -- as long as we preserve the authenticity of
the Holocaust.
Someday, in ten thousand years -- maybe much, much sooner -- future
historians and scholars will debate whether any Jews really were killed
in a WWII Holocaust. And “scholars” reviewing texts from ancient
Palestine-circa-2002
will uncover the Arab textbooks with maps of the region that show no
State of Israel.
Maybe someone will find a copy of a magazine that omitted a State of Israel
on its map, maybe other maps from the internet with such omissions. And
scholars will wonder and eventually deny whether there were Jews in Palestine-circa-2002.
As for me, I am satisfied with Mohammed’s teachings that there was a
Moses and an exodus of Jews from Egypt, and -- going back to our very
beginnings -- also an Abraham and an Ishmael. I am satisfied with
Christianity’s acceptance of the factual underpinnings of the Torah. And
I marvel at a people who build expensive and expansive edifices named
for Sinai -- temples named for Sinai, even hospitals named for Sinai --
but who further would deny the fundamental truth of their national
ancestry at Sinai and who even cleave to that identity of the persecuted
minority, willingly incurring hatred and vilification and mass genocide
for so adhering. I marvel at a people who devote more energy to
documenting suffering and murder in Europe sixty years ago than to
promoting the life-enriching values, beliefs, and fundamental teachings
that emerge from the nation’s life blood and from the greatest of all
our teachers, Moses the Prophet, who led us from Egypt to Sinai to
receive the Torah when G-d revealed Himself to our nation.